@inProceedings{broden-etal-2025-politics-349710, title = {The Politics of Compound Neologisms: A Novel Text-Mining Approach for Tracing Conceptual Transformations in Parliamentary Discourse and Data}, abstract = {This paper highlights the underutilized analytical potential of compounds and neologisms as indicators of discursive change in text mining applications, particularly in the study of parliamentary discourse and conceptual transformation. Drawing on results from two research projects, this project-wide paper discusses how compound neologisms function as markers of discursive change through case studies focused on the formation, frequency, and productivity of compounds related to the key concepts of 'market' and 'terrorism' in the Swedish Parliament. The analysis combines distant reading techniques to identify large-scale trends and close reading to examine the specific contexts of these compounds. By focusing on compound formation, we emphasize the analytical potential of basic linguistic features often overlooked in Digital Humanities research, offering a fresh perspective on large parliamentary datasets and their role in tracing conceptual transformations over time.}, booktitle = {Parliamentary Data in Action (DiPaDA 2024) workshop, Reykjavik, Iceland, May 28, 2024.}, author = {Brodén, Daniel and Ohlsson, Claes and Ängsal, Magnus Pettersson and Björck, Henrik and Fridlund, Mats and Olsson, Leif-Jöran and Runefelt, Leif and Virk, Shafqat Mumtaz}, year = {2025}, publisher = {University of Oslo Library}, address = {Oslo}, pages = {35--49}, } @inProceedings{olsson-etal-2025-augmented-349766, title = {Augmented Analysis of Parliamentary Debates: The Word Embedding and Context-sensitive Approach of the SweTerror Project}, abstract = {This paper delves into the SweTerror project’s use of word vectors to enhance the analysis of parliamentary debates concerning terrorism in Sweden during the electoral periods from 1968 to 2018. We focus on how word embeddings capture semantic shifts and the evolving context of key concepts like terror, terrorism, and extremism over time. By combining these computational tools with enriched metadata and document annotation as well as a mixed-methods and context-sensitive approach, we trace temporal changes in parliamentary discourse. The study demonstrates how generating vectors for distinct periods, such as electoral periods or parliamentary years, provides nuanced insights into conceptual transformations, including the introduction of the modern use of the concept of terrorism in the 1970s and the impact of the term violence-affirming extremism in the context of Islamism in the 2010s. We conclude by stressing that this approach allows for a more sophisticated analysis of linguistic and discursive patterns within Swedish parliamentary discourse.}, booktitle = {Digital Parliamentary Data in Action (DiPaDA 2024) Workshop}, author = {Olsson, Leif-Jöran and Brodén, Daniel and Ängsal, Magnus Pettersson and Fridlund, Mats and Öhberg, Patrik}, year = {2025}, pages = {90–105}, }